Operation Unthinkable Continues...
Destroying Ukraine is not collateral damage, it was always part of the plan
The US and NATO allies have been hell bent on resurrecting and implementing Operation Unthinkable, a plot concocted by Winston Churchill at the end of WWII. For those who have not heard of Operation Unthinkable, you can look it up on Wikipedia or at the National Archives.
As WWII wound down and it became clear that the USSR was going to defeat the German Nazis and occupy much of eastern Europe, the US and UK grew exceedingly uncomfortable with their perceptions of the trajectory of the post-war world.
From the National Archives:
“And here is the previously top secret plan (Operation Unthinkable), known only to Churchill, his three Chiefs of Staff and their immediate planning team. So the idea is to use a combined force of British, American, Polish, German forces to attack and defeat the Red Army and in the words of the planners: ‘The overall or political object is to impose upon Russia, the will of the United States and the British Empire’.”
While Operation Unthinkable was not implemented as originally planned, it was implemented, in a sense, in the form of a cold war that lasted for over 40 years. In Orwellian fashion, the most counterintuitive outcome of WWII was the rapidity in which allies became enemies and enemies became allies. The US was allied with the Soviet Union against both Germany and Japan, but on cessation of hostilities, Germany and Japan became friendly protectorates while the Soviet Union, who had done the bulk of the work to defeat Nazi Germany, became Enemy Number One for the US and Western Europe. The turnaround was immediate and based entirely on hubris and paranoia on the part of the US and Britain.
The US, in the afterglow of its first use of nuclear weapons on defenseless civilian cities in Japan, had ambitions to be the singular world hegemon, and war-torn Britain wanted to tag along to maintain what they could of their collapsing empire. A permanent, world-wide war footing would permit the US to justify outrageous military spending and expansion while simultaneously preventing the rise of the Soviet Union. And look where we are now, with US military bases spread across the globe and a war raging on Russia’s border; the ultimate dream of war profiteers and merchants of death.
The “aid” provided to Ukraine is a curious mix of weapons and supplies that would ensure eventual failure. No long-range missiles, no advanced fighter jets and not enough artillery or ammo. Joe Biden’s criminal act of sending banned cluster munitions to Ukraine is not an aberration, it is a continuation of the disastrous, morally bankrupt US foreign policy that initiated the Ukraine war in the first place. Russia abstained from using cluster munitions until Biden shipped hundreds of thousands of such shells to Ukraine. Once Ukraine had broken the taboo of using these on the battlefield, Russia was free to do so, and that must have been something that the Biden Administration knew would happen. But Russia has much larger, much more effective cluster bombs, and lots more of them, meaning that all Joe Biden did was open the door for Russia to use highly effective munitions they would not have used had the US not opened Pandora’s box.
It is very telling that The Blob has given Ukraine only short-range weapons to fight Russia, who has air superiority and longer-range weapons readily available. It is almost as if The Blob wanted to destroy Ukraine and harm Russia in one stroke. Why didn’t the Biden Administration tell Ukraine to use the limited weaponry in a defensive mode? Why force Ukraine to use the weapons in suicide runs at the fortified Russian defenses? The only reason that seems rational at all is to test weapons, intelligence and tactics against a peer enemy. The Blob is treating Ukraine like an expendable test subject rather than an ally.
In fact, nothing makes sense in The Blob’s strategy unless you come to one conclusion; that The Blob had two key motives in this proxy war. The first was to destroy Ukraine so that it could be carved up for profit. That is the only logical conclusion you can draw from the situation. Many pundits have noted that sending short range weapons to Ukraine, who faces a much larger country with very long-range weapons, a vast air force and a much better logistical situation with more resources and shorter, more direct supply lines, was bound to fail. The Blob’s intent was not to “save democracy” or “prevent totalitarianism”, but rather to make Eastern Ukraine a wasteland that became a major burden to Russia once the war was over. One thing you will never hear about this conflict is that the US and NATO wanted to lay waste to Ukraine. They wanted to turn two former allies into two mortal enemies, and have them thrash it out while The Blob sits back and laughs.
The secondary goal of the proxy war was to weaken Russia. This is where The Blob uses one admission of guilty truth to make the whole story sound more convincing. But the primary goal was to get two countries that The Blob hates to fight each other, and in the process destroy Ukraine while weakening Russia.
If you just shift your mindset and come to the conclusion that the US wanted to destroy and fracture Ukraine, and harm Russia in the process, then everything makes sense. The talk about "supporting Ukraine" is the big lie. The US has no reason to want to support a former Soviet enclave, but they do want to hurt Russia. What would hurt Russia more than forcing them to completely destroy Eastern Ukraine, only to have to rebuild everything they destroyed after the war is over? The West is not being stupid about "winning" in Ukraine, it is being smart about setting Ukraine up for destruction while harming Russia. Then, when the war is over, Russia will have to deal with a Ukraine that they themselves have laid waste to. Sheer brilliance from The Blob’s perspective.
Indeed, the US Corporate Owned News (CON) has been wondering aloud why the US told Ukraine to attack well-fortified Russian positions without air cover or sufficient artillery support. Such attacks are suicide missions, so if the US was interested in protecting Ukraine and Ukrainians, why would it demand that Ukraine send troops to their certain death?
https://fair.org/home/hyping-ukraine-counteroffensive-us-press-chose-propaganda-over-journalism/
It is because that was part of The Blob’s plan all along. After all, Ukraine was part of the former Soviet Union, which means it was part of the “Evil Empire”. What could be more delicious for The Blob than turning one Slavic country against its Slavic neighbor? It certainly seems more logical to conclude that the Biden Administration knew that Ukraine could not defeat Russia, and that claims of “regime change” in Moscow were fanciful deceit. Biden isn’t an intelligent person, but he isn’t a complete idiot either. There is no doubt that many of his advisers made it clear that Russia could be bloodied, but not defeated, and that was enough for Biden and his sick entourage to go for it. So, when American Psychopaths like Lindsey Graham say that the money spent on Ukraine was the best death and destruction that US money could buy, he wasn’t spinning, he was admitting that Ukraine was on the hit list too. The sad part is that Ukraine did not heed Kissinger’s warning that being a “friend” of the US was fatal*.
In the end, when this war is over and what is left of Ukraine is being sliced up like a roasted turkey on Thanksgiving, you will know for sure that Ukraine was a target. Ukraine was not an ally, but was instead a Kissingerian “friend” of The Blob.
*Kissinger: “It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal.”